Great essay! Personally i would love to have kids of my own, but it terrifies me what kind of stuff should i have to teach them, me and the mother.
I would date some women that dont like current modern stuff, but its mostly from a leftie dellusional viewpoint, they don't know any better. Current education has been feminized way too much.
And this causes the phenomena of women hating men for not being man enough. Thus they won't settle down to anybody that doesn't match all of their sexual, intellectual and monetary needs. Since their needs have become really more complex and materialistic, and man just keep basically the same. (This explains 80/20)
In Argentina there was a case where some woman separated from the father of her child, she became a lesbian and would share time spent with the kid with her ex. This woman was a typical feminist, a very hardcore one. Turns out she and her partner were torturing the little kid, then raped him and killed him. In her facebook page you can see that she hated men and sadly her son aswell. There were videos of the little kid crying when he was being tortured by their mothers. The father was asking for his son property way too before that but the law gives the benefit to the mother, thus result in this tragedy.
In the end i think women replaced "the man" for "men" and their feminine traits such as having kids for having pets, taking care of weak people as political activism for minorities or animals, etc. The unabomber predicted this in his manifesto, the idea of "sustitution".
The snake is eating itself at this point. Our society is gay, it hates winning it hates man, it hates kids and joy. If you are going to have a family make sure you and your gal are in the same page!
This is such a culture war brainrot arguement😭💀🙏🏼The problem isn't that society is gay,hates winning,kids,men or joys. The problem is that capitalism and liberalism ruins the idea of having non materialistic ideals. Before you thing I'm going to go on a anti capitalism rant like an annoying leftist,i want to state that I'm more of a post-liberal than leftist. Leftist/centre left people will always cry that "fascism is so on the rise and this is so bad for us economically" when fascist are unironically the least materialistic(and this is a good and bad thing sometimes depending on the situation)group of people, in the spaces between 1933-1938 n*azi germany experienced insane economic growth with a increase of gdp per capita and a decreased unemployment rate yet they sacrificed an entire economy,peace and prosperity just to proof they are better than all races in every sector of society(superiority and nationalism are non materialistic ideas as big corporations do not care about these thing unless its for marketing purposes). If they were smart they could have avoided war or only joined when threated like the usa yet they didn't. This isn't a defense of fascism but people from liberal capitalist countries have this as long as it's legal and profitable then its right attitude,which is horrible to understand if you approach the law from a philosophical view, Lily Phillips should be morally shamed, given something like a fine or atleast given some form of therapy(as she usually mentally disassociates from her events)for what she is doing but no one can do anything because what she is doing is legal and between two legal consenting adults. Thats the reason why people hate something like kids because the only approach they have to kids is that you shouldn't violate their rights but the real approach to having kids is what values should I install in them regardless of if they're legal or not,am i mentally fit to deal with a kid and does this align with my culture and community and would it benefit the non materialistic goal i am to spread(e.g greatness). The only way we can evolve is if we learn that just because something is legal doesn't mean that it's morally right(e.g Lily Phillips). The snake eats itself not because it's stupid,a feminist,gay,hates men or that woman replaced "the man" with sustitution but it eat itself cause it sees nothing wrong with eating itself.
Thanks for your response, i agree with everything, however i might add...
I'm talking about symptoms and you are talking about the roots which are found in liberalism yes.
I am not into cultural wars, i think they are unhealthy to my spirituality and social life, reject cultural wars would be my position!
When i talk about "gay" im not talking about sexual orientation but rather a passive viewpoint of life i.e not being life affirming. Gay in this sense means not being real, being afraid of slur words, conflict and violence. USA is the most gay country ever since they are afraid of saying certain words and their founders submit themselves to anyone that is not a WASP (idk if wrote it correctly, call it whites or whathever). This attitude of life is founded on liberalism which is an absolute contradiction, you gave an excellent example on Lilly Phillips. But at the same time reveals that the only way this moral foundation could be destroyed is by its acelerationism.
When we talk about morals we often give extreme examples of hypothetical situations to proof the limits of said moral. In this case we are starting to see these extreme situations that 20 years ago would have been stupid to even talk about in an hypothetical scenario.
I understand where you come from, of course the snake eats itself because it does not see anything wrong with it, but you know, they don't even see themselves as a snake eating itself, the problem is not too obvious to most of people until it's too late.
Great essay! Personally i would love to have kids of my own, but it terrifies me what kind of stuff should i have to teach them, me and the mother.
I would date some women that dont like current modern stuff, but its mostly from a leftie dellusional viewpoint, they don't know any better. Current education has been feminized way too much.
And this causes the phenomena of women hating men for not being man enough. Thus they won't settle down to anybody that doesn't match all of their sexual, intellectual and monetary needs. Since their needs have become really more complex and materialistic, and man just keep basically the same. (This explains 80/20)
In Argentina there was a case where some woman separated from the father of her child, she became a lesbian and would share time spent with the kid with her ex. This woman was a typical feminist, a very hardcore one. Turns out she and her partner were torturing the little kid, then raped him and killed him. In her facebook page you can see that she hated men and sadly her son aswell. There were videos of the little kid crying when he was being tortured by their mothers. The father was asking for his son property way too before that but the law gives the benefit to the mother, thus result in this tragedy.
In the end i think women replaced "the man" for "men" and their feminine traits such as having kids for having pets, taking care of weak people as political activism for minorities or animals, etc. The unabomber predicted this in his manifesto, the idea of "sustitution".
The snake is eating itself at this point. Our society is gay, it hates winning it hates man, it hates kids and joy. If you are going to have a family make sure you and your gal are in the same page!
This is such a culture war brainrot arguement😭💀🙏🏼The problem isn't that society is gay,hates winning,kids,men or joys. The problem is that capitalism and liberalism ruins the idea of having non materialistic ideals. Before you thing I'm going to go on a anti capitalism rant like an annoying leftist,i want to state that I'm more of a post-liberal than leftist. Leftist/centre left people will always cry that "fascism is so on the rise and this is so bad for us economically" when fascist are unironically the least materialistic(and this is a good and bad thing sometimes depending on the situation)group of people, in the spaces between 1933-1938 n*azi germany experienced insane economic growth with a increase of gdp per capita and a decreased unemployment rate yet they sacrificed an entire economy,peace and prosperity just to proof they are better than all races in every sector of society(superiority and nationalism are non materialistic ideas as big corporations do not care about these thing unless its for marketing purposes). If they were smart they could have avoided war or only joined when threated like the usa yet they didn't. This isn't a defense of fascism but people from liberal capitalist countries have this as long as it's legal and profitable then its right attitude,which is horrible to understand if you approach the law from a philosophical view, Lily Phillips should be morally shamed, given something like a fine or atleast given some form of therapy(as she usually mentally disassociates from her events)for what she is doing but no one can do anything because what she is doing is legal and between two legal consenting adults. Thats the reason why people hate something like kids because the only approach they have to kids is that you shouldn't violate their rights but the real approach to having kids is what values should I install in them regardless of if they're legal or not,am i mentally fit to deal with a kid and does this align with my culture and community and would it benefit the non materialistic goal i am to spread(e.g greatness). The only way we can evolve is if we learn that just because something is legal doesn't mean that it's morally right(e.g Lily Phillips). The snake eats itself not because it's stupid,a feminist,gay,hates men or that woman replaced "the man" with sustitution but it eat itself cause it sees nothing wrong with eating itself.
Thanks for your response, i agree with everything, however i might add...
I'm talking about symptoms and you are talking about the roots which are found in liberalism yes.
I am not into cultural wars, i think they are unhealthy to my spirituality and social life, reject cultural wars would be my position!
When i talk about "gay" im not talking about sexual orientation but rather a passive viewpoint of life i.e not being life affirming. Gay in this sense means not being real, being afraid of slur words, conflict and violence. USA is the most gay country ever since they are afraid of saying certain words and their founders submit themselves to anyone that is not a WASP (idk if wrote it correctly, call it whites or whathever). This attitude of life is founded on liberalism which is an absolute contradiction, you gave an excellent example on Lilly Phillips. But at the same time reveals that the only way this moral foundation could be destroyed is by its acelerationism.
When we talk about morals we often give extreme examples of hypothetical situations to proof the limits of said moral. In this case we are starting to see these extreme situations that 20 years ago would have been stupid to even talk about in an hypothetical scenario.
I understand where you come from, of course the snake eats itself because it does not see anything wrong with it, but you know, they don't even see themselves as a snake eating itself, the problem is not too obvious to most of people until it's too late.
It's so joever😭🙏🏼nothing ever happens😞🗣billions of chuds must wake up🧑🏻💻
Hey, you call yourself a postmodern.Reactionary, do you have any books on your ideology?I could read or what you would call theory